FIND A CAR

To find latest news, reviews, videos, ratings and more for a particular vehicle please select the manufacturer and model below and click submit

Latest Stories

- Martyn Collins

Nissan Pixo 1.0 N-TEC review

image for 'Nissan Pixo 1.0 N-TEC review'

The Nissan Pixo might have the honour of being the cheapest city car on sale, but is it cheerful enough to be compared to more modern rivals?

Think it looks like a Suzuki Alto? Well, you'd be right as the Pixo shares most of the design and engineering with the baby Suzuki and is also built at the same Indian plant.

Get a FREE NISSAN PIXO Brochure

Model Image

Looking for a new car then why not start with a glossy NISSAN PIXO brochure?

The Pixo might have a version of the Nissan family nose, with different headlights, grille and bumpers, but it's still difficult to tell the two cars apart.

Still, at least the bold wheel lips and the raised rear window line give the Pixo a clean and modern, if unimaginative look.

The driving position is generally good, and there's enough space even for taller drivers, though rear legroom suffers.

Head, leg and kneeroom are all limited in the back of the Pixo, with the upswept rear windows making it a claustrophobic place to sit.

We weren't expecting limo-like levels of quality and equipment in a city car priced under £10,000, but compared with other city car rivals the level of fit and finish was disappointing. All the plastics felt hard, sharp and shiny with mismatched grains.

Still, air-conditioning, electric front windows and a single-disc CD player were standard on the N-TEC model supplied for this test.

The Pixo's boot is tiny, with just a 129-litre capacity. It can be extended to a more respectable 367-litres with the rear seat folded. So, there's probably just enough room for a weeks worth of shopping.

There is no finesse to the Pixo's performance and handling. You have to work the 67bhp, three-cylinder 1.0-litre petrol engine hard to perform. Still, the Pixo averages an impressive 65.7mpg, emits just 103g/km of CO2 and wears its Pure Drive badge with pride.

There's lots of body roll in corners and the Pixo's ride borders on the uncomfortable, it crashes at low speeds and gets bouncy as you go faster.

The Pixo might be the cheapest car on sale but its interior and driveability disappoint.

Nissan Pixo 1.0 N-TEC

Price: £8,250

Engine: 1.0-litre, three-cylinder

Power: 67bhp, 120Nm

Max speed: 96.3mph

0-60mph: 14s

MPG: 65.7mpg Emissions:103g/km

Verdict: The Pixo might be cheap and will no doubt prove cost-effective to run, but its interior is disappointing and it's no fun to drive out of town.

COMMENTS

Request a Callback

Looking for assistance on buying your next new car? Just enter your details and one of our operators will shortly be in touch.

SUBMIT
Reviews

Review Archive

    1. 2013 [19]
      1. Jan 2013 [5]
      2. Feb 2013 [4]
      3. Mar 2013 [1]
      4. Apr 2013 [7]
      5. May 2013 [2]
    1. 2012 [112]
      1. Jan 2012 [8]
      2. Feb 2012 [10]
      3. Mar 2012 [9]
      4. Apr 2012 [10]
      5. May 2012 [8]
      6. Jun 2012 [11]
      7. Jul 2012 [13]
      8. Aug 2012 [11]
      9. Sep 2012 [6]
      10. Oct 2012 [12]
      11. Nov 2012 [8]
      12. Dec 2012 [6]
    1. 2011 [133]
      1. Jan 2011 [10]
      2. Feb 2011 [9]
      3. Mar 2011 [14]
      4. Apr 2011 [8]
      5. May 2011 [10]
      6. Jun 2011 [14]
      7. Jul 2011 [11]
      8. Aug 2011 [11]
      9. Sep 2011 [12]
      10. Oct 2011 [10]
      11. Nov 2011 [12]
      12. Dec 2011 [12]
    1. 2010 [102]
      1. Jan 2010 [5]
      2. Feb 2010 [9]
      3. Mar 2010 [12]
      4. Apr 2010 [7]
      5. May 2010 [10]
      6. Jun 2010 [9]
      7. Jul 2010 [10]
      8. Aug 2010 [9]
      9. Sep 2010 [5]
      10. Oct 2010 [9]
      11. Nov 2010 [11]
      12. Dec 2010 [6]
    1. 2009 [98]
      1. Jan 2009 [9]
      2. Feb 2009 [10]
      3. Mar 2009 [9]
      4. Apr 2009 [12]
      5. May 2009 [7]
      6. Jun 2009 [4]
      7. Jul 2009 [9]
      8. Aug 2009 [6]
      9. Sep 2009 [4]
      10. Oct 2009 [12]
      11. Nov 2009 [10]
      12. Dec 2009 [6]
    1. 2008 [106]
      1. Jan 2008 [8]
      2. Feb 2008 [12]
      3. Mar 2008 [9]
      4. Apr 2008 [13]
      5. May 2008 [9]
      6. Jun 2008 [6]
      7. Jul 2008 [8]
      8. Aug 2008 [8]
      9. Sep 2008 [4]
      10. Oct 2008 [9]
      11. Nov 2008 [10]
      12. Dec 2008 [10]
    1. 2007 [105]
      1. Jan 2007 [5]
      2. Feb 2007 [10]
      3. Mar 2007 [12]
      4. Apr 2007 [10]
      5. May 2007 [10]
      6. Jun 2007 [8]
      7. Jul 2007 [9]
      8. Aug 2007 [9]
      9. Sep 2007 [7]
      10. Oct 2007 [11]
      11. Nov 2007 [10]
      12. Dec 2007 [4]
    1. 2006 [79]
      1. Jan 2006 [5]
      2. Feb 2006 [5]
      3. Mar 2006 [8]
      4. Apr 2006 [7]
      5. May 2006 [6]
      6. Jun 2006 [8]
      7. Jul 2006 [12]
      8. Aug 2006 [7]
      9. Sep 2006 [6]
      10. Oct 2006 [7]
      11. Nov 2006 [3]
      12. Dec 2006 [5]
    1. 2005 [72]
      1. May 2005 [1]
      2. Jul 2005 [4]
      3. Aug 2005 [12]
      4. Sep 2005 [19]
      5. Oct 2005 [16]
      6. Nov 2005 [12]
      7. Dec 2005 [8]
    1. 2004 [1]
      1. Jan 2004 [1]

Also in Reviews

Facebook

TWITTER

Loading..

View Specifications

X

Please select the vehicle you that you want to see specification information:

comments powered by Disqus