FIND A CAR

To find latest news, reviews, videos, ratings and more for a particular vehicle please select the manufacturer and model below and click submit

Latest Stories

- Martyn Collins

Chevrolet Spark 1.2 LT review

image for 'Chevrolet Spark 1.2 LT review'

Do you remember the Daewoo/Chevrolet Matiz? Thought not, as it was far from class best and struggled on for seven years. The sharp looking Spark is its replacement and has been with us for around two years.

Based on the Beat concept that went on to become the Spark, it's a star of all the recent Transformer films. Sadly, the concept car that appears on screen is more exciting than the city car that we have here.

Get a FREE quote on your next CHEVROLET SPARK

Model Image

Click below and save up to 30% on a new CHEVROLET SPARK

Still, let's start with what the Spark does well. The attractive but boxy profile means there's plenty of head- and legroom in the Chevy. The Chevy Spark is one of the most comfortable ways of transporting tall passengers around.

Where it scores over rivals, is its five-door practicality. In fact, the only compromise is the tiny 170-litre boot, which is only good for a couple of shopping bags. There is plenty of standard kit with the range-topping LT specification, but we weren't keen on the cheap feel of the trim and plastics considering the price.

The Spark's looks might be sharp, but its driving experience might leave you feeling a bit short changed. The 1.2-litre petrol engine isn't particularly powerful and the gearchange is slow-witted.

This means you'll have to work it hard to make decent progress and then it gets noisy. So, should you decide to take it out of the city, the engine, wind and road noise won't make driving the Chevrolet a particularly enjoyable experience.

This is a shame as the Chevrolet Spark actually rides quite well, even though there's lots of body roll in corners, but there's no fun for the keener driver.

Model: Chevrolet Spark 1.2 LT

Price: £10,695

Engine: 1.2-litre, four-cylinder

Power: 80bhp, 111Nm

Max speed: 102mph

0-60mph: 12.1s

MPG: 55.4mpg Emissions:119g/km

Verdict: Neat styling, spacious interior but rivals are better made and better to drive than the Chevrolet.

COMMENTS

Request a Callback

Looking for assistance on buying your next new car? Just enter your details and one of our operators will shortly be in touch.

SUBMIT
Reviews

Review Archive

    1. 2013 [21]
      1. Jan 2013 [5]
      2. Feb 2013 [4]
      3. Mar 2013 [1]
      4. Apr 2013 [7]
      5. May 2013 [4]
    1. 2012 [112]
      1. Jan 2012 [8]
      2. Feb 2012 [10]
      3. Mar 2012 [9]
      4. Apr 2012 [10]
      5. May 2012 [8]
      6. Jun 2012 [11]
      7. Jul 2012 [13]
      8. Aug 2012 [11]
      9. Sep 2012 [6]
      10. Oct 2012 [12]
      11. Nov 2012 [8]
      12. Dec 2012 [6]
    1. 2011 [133]
      1. Jan 2011 [10]
      2. Feb 2011 [9]
      3. Mar 2011 [14]
      4. Apr 2011 [8]
      5. May 2011 [10]
      6. Jun 2011 [14]
      7. Jul 2011 [11]
      8. Aug 2011 [11]
      9. Sep 2011 [12]
      10. Oct 2011 [10]
      11. Nov 2011 [12]
      12. Dec 2011 [12]
    1. 2010 [102]
      1. Jan 2010 [5]
      2. Feb 2010 [9]
      3. Mar 2010 [12]
      4. Apr 2010 [7]
      5. May 2010 [10]
      6. Jun 2010 [9]
      7. Jul 2010 [10]
      8. Aug 2010 [9]
      9. Sep 2010 [5]
      10. Oct 2010 [9]
      11. Nov 2010 [11]
      12. Dec 2010 [6]
    1. 2009 [98]
      1. Jan 2009 [9]
      2. Feb 2009 [10]
      3. Mar 2009 [9]
      4. Apr 2009 [12]
      5. May 2009 [7]
      6. Jun 2009 [4]
      7. Jul 2009 [9]
      8. Aug 2009 [6]
      9. Sep 2009 [4]
      10. Oct 2009 [12]
      11. Nov 2009 [10]
      12. Dec 2009 [6]
    1. 2008 [106]
      1. Jan 2008 [8]
      2. Feb 2008 [12]
      3. Mar 2008 [9]
      4. Apr 2008 [13]
      5. May 2008 [9]
      6. Jun 2008 [6]
      7. Jul 2008 [8]
      8. Aug 2008 [8]
      9. Sep 2008 [4]
      10. Oct 2008 [9]
      11. Nov 2008 [10]
      12. Dec 2008 [10]
    1. 2007 [105]
      1. Jan 2007 [5]
      2. Feb 2007 [10]
      3. Mar 2007 [12]
      4. Apr 2007 [10]
      5. May 2007 [10]
      6. Jun 2007 [8]
      7. Jul 2007 [9]
      8. Aug 2007 [9]
      9. Sep 2007 [7]
      10. Oct 2007 [11]
      11. Nov 2007 [10]
      12. Dec 2007 [4]
    1. 2006 [79]
      1. Jan 2006 [5]
      2. Feb 2006 [5]
      3. Mar 2006 [8]
      4. Apr 2006 [7]
      5. May 2006 [6]
      6. Jun 2006 [8]
      7. Jul 2006 [12]
      8. Aug 2006 [7]
      9. Sep 2006 [6]
      10. Oct 2006 [7]
      11. Nov 2006 [3]
      12. Dec 2006 [5]
    1. 2005 [72]
      1. May 2005 [1]
      2. Jul 2005 [4]
      3. Aug 2005 [12]
      4. Sep 2005 [19]
      5. Oct 2005 [16]
      6. Nov 2005 [12]
      7. Dec 2005 [8]
    1. 2004 [1]
      1. Jan 2004 [1]

Also in Reviews

Facebook

TWITTER

Loading..

View Specifications

X

Please select the vehicle you that you want to see specification information:

comments powered by Disqus